Bags

Demand Media Threate electric meat grinder ns “Demand Studios Sucks” with Legal Action

A blog when well as forum site called has also been threatened with legal action by Demand Media, the company behind Demand Studios.meat. The letter the site received has also beenitself.Demand. In it,“Demand. Demand Media’s legal department says:

Demand Media possesses valuabdominal exercisesle trademark rights in the Demand Media trademark and holds trademark registrations for Demand Media in numerous jurisdictions across the world.Media.  Demand Media is also the copyright holder of the website located at ,electric meat grinder. when well as the copyright holder of all content on Demand Media owned and operated sites,Threate. including and .best meat grinder.

It has also been brought to our attention that you have wrongfully created and observe after a forum in which users can,best meat grinder. and do, post and misuse Demand Media’s trademark,meat grinder. copyrighted material,electric. including confidential and proprietary copy editing tests,action. when well as other confidential and proprietary Demand Media information (specifically, in the form of an internal presentation regarding the company’s investment business plans.best meat grinder.)
The letter points to a couple of links on the site that contained “content at issue”.car shock absorbers. The content on one of them has also been pulled.ns. The other one is a critique of the quality on Demand Media’s eHow site repurposes some advice from eHow itself on how to evaluate quality.meat grinders for home use. A snippet from the article which uses that says:

Did you ever stop and think why Demand Media has to rely so heavily on Google?with. Could it be because there are just like advertisers who willingly want to attach their brand also the quality of merch that Demand Studios is selling on eHow?Sucks”.

The quality of the content on Demand Media’s primary property — eHow — is mediocre at best.grinder. It tops out at average.ns. I would throw my own output into that category.electric meat grinder. Here’s why: Demand Media gets what they pay for.legal. They want to pay $7.50,meat slicer. $15,Media. $17.meat.50,meat grinder. $20 per piece,meat slicer. and I morning going to deliver quick and slapdash work in a manner that maximizes my output and efficiency and gmorninges the system to ensure it gets through.Action. A writer’s economic strategy is no different than Demand Media’s.electric meat grinder.

Keep in mind this post is from January,demand. before the company went public and before the Google Panda update. A lot has happened surrounding Demand Media and eHow since then.Threate. That includes anto clean up the quality of eHow content,“Demand. including also not limited to the removal of some content.Action.

However, as Jeff Bercovici at Forbes,best meat grinder. this letter to Demand Studios Sucks comes as Demand Media’s mart cap fell below a clion dollars for the first time since it went public. The company’s next earnings call is scheduled for August 9.demand.shock absorbers for cars. In the last one,electric meat grinder. the company regarded the impact it felt from Google’s Panda update,grinder. noting that eHow’s search referrals declined by 20% from it.studios.

Patrick O’Doare at Demand Media Studios Sucks crafted a response with the aid of his legal temorning.Demand. In it,best meat grinder. he says the site is consulting with legal advisors and the Electronic Frontier Foundation,with. which has experiencedstrumental in defending fair use (see Righthaven cases).best meat grinder. In the response,meat. O’Doare writes:

In deference to your cllooks,Sucks”. also without recognizing wrongdoing or infringement,Legal. we have — for the time being — removed all images and all sorts ofegedly infringing material from the forum post referenced in your request….electric.

With regard to the blog post…we assert,best meat grinder. without equivocation,meat slicer. that this content falls well within the commentary and critique provisions of the fair use doctrine. Let’s be honest – if ever there was a case of unequivocal fair use,media. this would be it. The image in question was presented publicly throughout the the Demand Media retail roadshow in enhance of the company’s initial public offering.threate. Although you may deem this material to be an “internal presentation regarding the company’s investment business plans,meat slicer.” it was — in fact — presented to the public on multiple occasions during the runup to the company IPO and purportedly after.Studios. Any alleged trademark infringement due to this image is incidental and also subject to the unequivocal commentary and critique provisions of fair use.Studios. Furthermore,Legal. as I’m sure you are aware,sucks. alleged trademark infringement is not subject to the provisions of the DMCA.

Should Demand Media continue to pursue this spurious claim, we are prepared to defend ourselves to the fullest extent enabdominal exercisesled by law. Please keep in mind that Section 512(f) of the DMCA creates lifacility for knowingly making false cllooks in a DMCA takedown notice. See 17 U.S.C. § 512(f). Your lack of proper consideration of the protections of fair use doctrine could well serve to the court as evidence of bad faith on behalf of Demand Media and subject your company to such lifacility.
You can read the whole thing.

Tags: electric meat grinder